FDE Times: in OT, AI may recommend but must never command the PLC
A 12 October guide for forward deployed engineers lays out three design rules from CISA and partners’ OT AI guidance, plus IEC 62443 zones, conduits and security levels, so AI stays outside the control loop.
On a plant floor, operations teams care less about model cleverness than whether your system can write to a PLC. FDE Times published a practical guide on 12 October 2026 that turns late-2025 joint guidance from CISA, Australia’s ASD ACSC and partners into three rules FDEs can take into an OT customer: data may flow out, but commands may not flow in; humans keep decisions that affect the physical world; and there must always be a documented way to switch the AI off and fall back to manual or fixed-rule control.
The piece maps those rules onto ISA/IEC 62443 vocabulary—zones, conduits, and security levels as a vector across seven foundational requirements (target, capability and achieved)—and walks through a pumping-station energy agent that only proposes schedule changes an operator then enters through the HMI. It also flags common mistakes: treating “read-only” as an account permission on a two-way link, turning approvers into reflexive button-pressers, and claiming “SL2” as if a security level were a single number.
For FDEs, the career tip is concrete: when a job post mentions IEC 62443, NIST SP 800-82 or OT/ICS, bring a zone-and-conduit diagram and a one-page failure-state sheet to the interview, and describe designs that keep AI recommendations out of the control path.
Source: fdetimes.net